SETTING THE MOOD FOR CARIFESTA X
- at launch of new GT&T directory
By Priya Nauth
THE Guyana Telephone and Telegraph (GT&T) Company, Thursday evening launched its 2008 Directory at the Georgetown Club, highlighting the Caribbean Festival of Creative Arts X (CARIFESTA X), which will be hosted in Guyana from August 22-31.

CHIEF Executive Officer of GT&T, Major General (ret’d) Joe Singh, at right, hands over a copy of the 2008 Telephone Directory to Minister of Culture, Youth and Sport, Dr. Frank Anthony. (Photo by Cullen Bess-Nelson)
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer of GT&T, Major General (ret’d) Joe Singh, said that the logo speaks about ‘one Caribbean and one Purpose’ and ‘our culture and our life’.
Noting the importance of CARIFESTA, he emphasised that “…one cannot help but be motivated in more than one way to identify with such an occasion”.
He observed that the directory is more than just a reference document; it is an information tool and highlights various aspects of life in Guyana.
Singh said GT&T will like to see the directory not only as an information tool but as a focus or vision of where we are headed.
The CEO said in contributing to CARIFESTA, GT&T has also committed to assisting in the enhancement and beautification programme of various areas in the city and as a memento, a pre-paid card with the CARIFESTA logo on the back will be issued.
He noted too that the company is working with community based agencies to assist artistes who wish to take part in CARIFESTA activities.
Project Coordinator (Telephone Directory) Guyenterprise, Ms. Lisa Insanally, said the directory is the 15th edition, with the first coming out in 1992, and getting bigger each year.
Ms. Insanally said the production process of the directory is six months and the composition of accurate information is tedious and takes a lot of research and time.
She said that GT&T continues to work with the Guyana Tourism Authority to provide necessary information for visitors and the new issue has a feature on birding, a new and popular tourist activity here.
Insanally said the original theme for the directory was Bridges, with the Berbice and Takatu Bridges currently under construction; but the decision to focus on CARIFESTA X was taken when it was announced that it would be held in Guyana this year.
An important part of the directory centres on CARIFESTA X, with information on events and for persons who are desirous of participating.
Minister of Culture, Youth and Sport, Dr. Frank Anthony, also reiterated that the directory is not only used to access numbers, but has become an important tool for information on our history, geography and many other things.
Congratulating GT&T, he noted that last year the company had given the Ministry space in the directory to highlight Cricket World Cup 2007, and now CARIFESTA X.
“I think this is the first time we have CARIFESTA highlighted in a directory… in the way this one has been done,” he observed.
CNS channel 6 gets four months suspension for License infringements
THE television License of CNS Channel 6, owned and operated by Mr. Chandra Narine Sharma, has been suspended for a period of four months, beginning midnight last night.
Sharma’s License was suspended after his television station was found to have committed serious infringements of the conditions of the Licence by broadcasting on four occasions, including three rebroadcasts, of content that advocated the killing of Guyanese Head of State, President Bharrat Jagdeo.
The threat on the life of the President was made by a ‘caller’ on the controversial live call-in programme on CNS channel 6 ‘The Voice of the People’.
Below is a statement issued late last night by the Government Information Agency (GINA) outlining the reasons for the suspension:
“On February 26, 2008 and March 10, 2008, the Licensee of CNS Television Channel 6 Licence No. 332V/12/OT/2001 (“the Licensee”), was written to by the Advisory Committee on Broadcasting (ACB) concerning alleged infringements of the conditions of the Licence on February 21, February 22 and February 23, 2008.
The ACB’s letter of February 26, 2008 cited infringements by the Licensee (Sharma) of the Licence Conditions by broadcasting content on the “Voice of the People” programme aired on February 21, 2008, that was an incitement to crime, was offensive to public feeling, was offensive to good taste, was presented without due accuracy and attempted to trivialise serious statements made by the Head of State. In particular, the ACB noted the following offending content:-
“Caller: The President was out of the country. As soon as he got back, he knew exactly who did the massacre at Bartica
Host: How do you know he knew?
Caller: He made that statement yesterday on the air....The very people who did the act at Lusignan did that there. How can he prove that? What evidence does he have to prove that?”
“Caller: ...and the next thing, Mr. Sharma, Jagdeo have some expire Ministers walking with him and them giving up a lot of new fire as far as I am concerned. Because look at these killings and nobody can’t give account about these people’s lives and Jagdeo going to take a high risk job by going and tell people to calm down; he’s going to bury the dead bodies. If anything is going to happen to my family, I am going to kill Jagdeo.”
The ACB further required the Licensee to indicate within three days of the date of the Letter, his position in respect of the infringements.
The Licensee responded to the ACB on February 28, 2008, expressing regret about the content of the “Voice of the People” Programme aired on February 21, 2008 and indicating that he did reprimand that caller for “making such irresponsible statements on the air”.
The Licensee also indicated that he is in the process of installing a delay failure on the telephone used for live broadcasts that should prevent future occurrences. The Licensee also apologised for the “unfortunate incident”.
The ACB then wrote to the Licensee on February 29, 2008, accepting his apology and indicated that no further action will be taken in respect of the ACB’s letter of February 26, 2008.
Then on March 10, 2008, the ACB wrote to the Licensee citing the Licensee for infringements of the Licence conditions by re-broadcasting on February 22 and February 23, 2008, the very same programme first aired on February 21, 2008, ” with the offending words intact”.
The ACB further noted that each rebroadcast was a new infringement and that though the first broadcast was a spontaneous infringement, the Licensee could have edited out the offending words before the rebroadcasts were aired. Again the ACB required the licensee to indicate his position in respect of these infringements.
The Licensee responded on March 28, 2008, stating that the programme in question was not re-aired after the ACB’s first letter of February 26, 2008 and that when it was re-aired on the occasions prior to the ACB’s February 26 letter, it was done without the knowledge of the Licensee by the “person who books programmes”.
The Licensee expressed regret about the rebroadcasts and indicated that he would put in place measures to ensure that such an occurrence was not repeated.
On April 2, 2008 the ACB forwarded to President Bharrat Jagdeo, as the Minister responsible for communications, copies of the letters sent to the Licensee and the responses from the Licence.
The ACB was set up in 2001 as an Advisory Committee pursuant to the Wireless Telegraphy Regulations made on November 17, 2001, under the Post and Telegraph Act, Cap 47:01 (“the Act”).
The functions of the ACB are to advise the Minister on compliance by Licensee with the terms and condition of licences and to recommend to the Minister appropriate action which may be taken including revocation of a licence where a Licensee is in breach of the terms and conditions of the Licence.
The role of the ACB is merely advisory. The Minister is the sole authority vested with power to decide whether a Licensee has breached the terms and conditions of their Licence and/or the provisions of the Act or the Regulations and whether any sanctions may be imposed therefore.
The Act provides that the Minister may suspend or cancel the Licence for such breaches.
In view of the statutory authority and responsibility vested in the Minister, Dr. Roger Luncheon, Head of the Presidential Secretariat/Secretary to the Cabinet, wrote to the Licensee on April 8, 2008, on behalf of the Minister indicating that the Minister was of the opinion that the Licensee’s written responses to the ACB concerning the infringements cited by the ACB were not adequate.
Further, the letter noted that the Minister is of the opinion that the infringements were sufficiently grave to warrant cancellation or suspension of the Licence. The letter also reminded the Licensee that the Act and the regulations provided for the suspension or cancellation of the Licence for breach or infringement of the conditions of the Licence.
The Licensee was invited to meet with Dr. Luncheon, on behalf of the Minister on Thursday, April 10, 2008 concerning the alleged infringements and to show cause why the Licence should not be cancelled or suspended. The Licensee was also invited to bring his legal or other representative to the hearing.
Prior to the hearing, twenty minutes before the time of the scheduled hearing, the licensee approached the court for, and obtained an order prohibiting Dr. Luncheon from conducting the hearing on the basis that he had no authority to conduct the hearing.
In view of the court order, President Jagdeo issued a letter similarly worded as the April 8, 2008 letter from Dr. Luncheon and invited the Licensee to attend a hearing on Friday, 11 April 2008 at 3:00 p.m.
The Licensee attended the hearing with his legal counsel and others. The Licensee requested that the President, acting as Minister of Communications recuse himself form the hearing as he is an interested party.
The Licensee further indicated that he had approached the court earlier in the day for an order to prevent the President as Minister of Communications form hearing the matter.
The Licensee indicated that such an order was not granted prior to the hearing and that the matter was scheduled to be considered by the court next week.
The Licensee clearly sought to prevent hearing of the matter in every case, both through the Minister’s delegate and by the Minister himself.
The President as Minister, in company of the Attorney-General, heard the Licensee on the charges of alleged infringements and allowed full opportunity to the Licensee to show cause why the Licence should not be cancelled or suspended.
The Licensee acknowledged at the hearing that the broadcasts infringed the conditions of the licence and the law.
The Licensee was found to have failed to provide satisfactory explanation as to why the offending broadcasts continued to be aired on CNS Channel 6, even after the licensee recognised that the content of the programme infringed the conditions of the Licence.
The licensee was accordingly found to have committed serious infringements of the conditions of the Licence by broadcasting on four occasions, including three rebroadcasts, of content that advocated the killing of the Head of State and Government.
The broadcasts clearly constituted extremely grave offences. Under no circumstances could the Minister allow a Licensee to use the airwaves, without sanction, to advocate the killing of any citizen, moreso a Head of State and Government.
The Minister therefore decided that the licence would be suspended for four months with effect from midnight April 11, 2008.”
Hinckson remanded again
EX-GUYANA Defence Force (GDF) Lieutenant Oliver Hinckson, mired in allegations of sedition and conspiracy to commit a terrorist act, was yesterday further remanded to prison when he made another appearance before Magistrate Gordon Gilhuys.
The 64-year-old Army veteran of 167 Meadow Brook Gardens, Georgetown, was given his next Court date as April 17.
The charges against him said, last January 31, he advocated terrorism and made a seditious speech to the public and news media, the purpose of which was to solicit hatred and contempt and promote public disorder.
Yesterday, one of Hinckson’s lawyers, Mr. Gregory Gaskin, continued to apply for bail for his client, urging the Magistrate to allow the Law to help him make the decision.
Gaskin submitted various authorities from which he quoted, giving the Magistrate a copy of each, while he implored him to consider the granting of bail.
The lawyer further told the Magistrate that he did not have before him any reasonable suspicion that Hinckson will commit a crime if he is released on bail.
Gaskin asked the Magistrate for Hinckson to be able to address the Court and this request was granted.
Hinckson said he has four weeks to go before the date of his next examination. He said if he misses the lectures before this date, he would not be in a position to write his exams and will have to wait another year until he is able to do so.
“I am the only prisoner out of 1,200 others who have not been given an opportunity to write my exams. After Mr. Erskine said yes to my request, someone from one of the Government Ministries sent to inform the prison authorities that I could not go,” Hinckson said.
But Police Inspector Robert Tyndall, prosecuting, said he was maintaining his position with regard to bail because Hinckson is a “repeat offender” and it was while he was on bail for the serious offences of unlawful possession of a gun and ammunition that he was charged with the new offences.
Tyndall said these offences, if Hinckson is proven guilty, carry mandatory imprisonment.
The Magistrate then announced that he was not inclined to grant bail because the reason he initially refused bail was because Hinckson had the firearm matters pending.
He said until such time as the proceedings in the High Court subside, he will not grant Hinckson his pre-trial freedom.
The cases in which Hinckson and other ex-soldier James Gibson are jointly charged with illegal possession of a gun and ammunition were also called yesterday and continued in Gibson’s absence.
On last March 31, Magistrate Gilhuys had announced that he was recalling the warrant previously issued for Gibson and proceeding ‘ex-parte’.
Detective Inspector Carlton Charles, stationed at Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Headquarters, was called yesterday by Prosecutor Tyndall to give evidence.
These matters were also adjourned to April 17.
Particulars of the offence surrounding the joint charge said, on June 6, 2006, in a house on Aubrey Barker Street, South Ruimveldt, Georgetown, the defendants had a .38 pistol, 12 rounds of matching ammunition and twenty-six 12-gauge shotgun cartridges, without licences for them.
Woodbine hotel manager murdered
THE bloody and battered body of well-known Woodbine Hotel Manager Rawle Grimes was discovered early yesterday morning lying next to his car in Le Repentir Cemetery, Georgetown.
His sister, Marcie Grimes, told the Guyana Chronicle she

Murdered Rawle Grimes |
|
|
|
learnt of her brother’s death via a telephone call from a relative.
When she reached the scene, the police had already cordoned if off and she was unable to view the body.
The young woman said her brother was murdered in the most gruesome manner, according to people who saw the body and told her about it.
She was told that he was bleeding from the nose and mouth, and his shirt was stuffed in his mouth.
Marcie Grimes added that her brother’s head was bashed in and he was lying in a pool of blood just near the middle gate in the cemetery.
The body was discovered by passers-by on their way to work, and by the time the Police arrived, a large crowd had gathered for a glimpse of the man they all knew.
Some shouted loudly, while his relatives erupted in loud wails of grief.
The 29-year-old left home as usual for work on Thursday night. He returned to his 468 East Ruimveldt, Georgetown home shortly after 1:30 h and left to go out, his brother, Teddy Grimes, said.
The car he drove was parked next to his body and was taken away by the police when his body was removed by undertakers.
At the man’s home yesterday, relatives could not contain their grief as they held the pictures of their loved one.
PI in Lusignan massacre commences
THE Preliminary Inquiry (PI) into the murder charge against 19-year-old James Hyles, nicknamed ‘Sally’, who had been charged with the murders of the 11 Lusignan massacre victims, started yesterday.
Hyles yesterday made another appearance at Vigilance Court, on the East Coast of Demerara, before Magistrate Sherdel Isaacs, who adjourned the case to April 25, and Police Inspector Edmond Cooper, prosecuting, indicated that he was ready to proceed with his first witness.
He then called Police Constable Kelon Fraser, stationed at Vigilance Police Station, who began giving evidence.
The witness was then cross-examined by one of Hyles’ lawyers, Mr. Mark Waldron, and re-examination was declined by Prosecutor Cooper.
While the officer was giving his testimony, Hyles could have been seen smiling broadly and shaking his head at certain statements made in the witness box.
He appeared neatly dressed in a white shirt and black jeans and was very composed throughout the hearing, supported by a number of his relatives in the Courtroom.
On the last occasion, when Hyles appeared in Court, Prosecutor Cooper confirmed that he would be the Prosecutor, but he applied for an adjournment as he said the file was still with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), awaiting further advice.
Hyles, a mini-bus conductor, of 70 Friendship, on East Coast Demerara, is accused of unlawfully killing Clarence Thomas, 48, Vanessa Thomas, 12, Ron Thomas, 11, Mohandai Gourdat, 32, Seegopaul Harilall, 10, Seegobind Harilall, four, Dhanrajie Ramsingh, 52, Seecharran Rooplall, 56, Raywattie Ramsingh, 11, Shazam Mohamed, 22, as well as Shalem Baksh, 52, last January 26, at Track ‘A’ Lusignan.