|
A basket case
SHE wore a battered sponge slipper and a plain burgundy cotton dress.
Sweat streaming down her face, she kept up the chant: "People’s power, no dictator."
I knew her from the East Coast Demerara. She walked through the streets every weekday, but then with a different refrain: "Fish and shrimps - ah yo come get it gal, nice and fresh."
A huge and overladen wicker basket balanced precariously atop her head and more than once I thought it was a weight that only a very strong man could bear. But she walked from street to street and her only complaint sometimes was about bad weather. (Years ago someone told me that the "shrimps lady" now owns three houses in Richmond Hill, Queens NY. She spends most of her summer just sitting on the porch chatting with other Guyanese immigrants.)
On that day, however, I was a young man sitting on my bicycle (in case I needed a quick escape from PNC political thugs) while she, this Indian woman in her late forties walked in front of a huge procession. Walter Rodney’s funeral march was not an event I wanted to miss!
What a remarkable Afro-Guyanese leader! Dr. Rodney influenced so many, even though their differences appeared so great; shrimp vendors and university lecturers, factory and office workers, straight-hair people, and curly-hair people, dark brown people and just brown people.
To everyone believing in Rodney, these differences had no meaning.
Yet now in Guyana we hear people saying that Indians will vote only for Indians. This generalisation is not true.
When presented with genuine and competent leadership, Indians will rally to that cause, race notwithstanding. The early Working People’s Alliance (WPA) and Dr. Rodney’s immense popularity in Indian communities established this truism.
Accusations of "apan jhat" are a ruse being used by the incompetent leaders in the political opposition to deflect attention from their abysmal record in government.
It is distasteful to imply that you cannot get elected because of your race, while behind your back you hide an appalling history of corruption, decline, violence, incompetence, and ruination.
How can you expect to inspire voter confidence when you are responsible for making Guyana "poorer than Haiti"?
No one can deny that Dr. Rodney could have been elected president by an overwhelming majority. And this could only have been accomplished by a massive Indian vote.
No one can deny that a large and significant number of Indians in Guyana would have voted for the Afro-centric Walter Rodney. Ask yourself why.
To me it was because people saw a man of honour and integrity, a genuine leader and a decent human being. Guyanese did not see his skin colour; they simply heartened to the man inside.
And in Guyana there are still many Afro-Guyanese leaders of such upstanding quality; teachers, doctors, lawyers, businessmen, farmers, soldiers, husbands and fathers.
The unfortunate thing is that these noble souls are not opposition politicians. Instead we have to contend with those who have been tried and found wanting - the charlatans of the political opposition.
The PNC has painted its basket black and is demanding that Guyanese use it to fetch water. If the people select a pail instead, which just happens to be painted brown, the PNC and their media minions then cry foul.
"See," they complain, "these people refuse our basket because it is black."
But as you already know, the truth is that no matter what the colour, you simply cannot use a basket to fetch water.
JUSTIN DEFREITAS
Watch those comments
I AM somewhat offended by Mr. Jose Damiao Leandro's comment on the education of the Guyanese people in his letter in Saturday’s Chronicle.
He should do more research while he's at it. Guyana is at least 98% literate. A very high score throughout the world.
Guyana is a third world country but that does not mean that the people are ignorant.
He should be more careful about our people and our country with his comments.
Sorry to slam you sir, but I will always defend my fellow Guyanese people.
No matter how long I've been away and no matter how far I am (in miles) Guyana is always close to my heart.
PROUD OVERSEAS GUYANESE
Advance our democracy
THE Guyana Government is to be commended for its outstanding work.
The evidence is clear and you can daily see the highlights of the progress the government is making in terms of strengthening our democracy, having policies that encourage investors, building infrastructure and delivering on its many promises.
No doubt, the tone and works of the administration of President Bharrat Jagdeo are encouraging and more can be done if all in the political circle who have been invited can come on board.
This government should feel a sense of accomplishment for it has done much more than had anticipated by many, but the progress of this administration should not allow it to become low task, high people and complacent.
Much is still to be done and as the saying goes "good is not good when better is expected".
With this approach and with such progress by this government, if all the opposition parties can come together with the government and have a multilateral approach on the national agenda, Guyana can become a pride of the western hemisphere.
The tremendous faith and potential of Guyana and its people have been recognised by international, regional and local observers.
As the days go by, one can only be encouraged to see the government and opposition leaders become more democratic/benevolent so as to make the decision table broad enough to make accommodation.
Let our democracy continue to be on the move.
JACOB AMIN
Articulating a ghost
I REFER to the letter by Justin DeFreitas (Guyana Chronicle 1/06/05) captioned “Game Exposed”.
Per Killian Knote’s previous letter, the scholarship preferred by gay militancy is usually found to be circuitous, confusing, and contemptuous of logic, and it is not difficult to diagnose the disease in DeFreitas’ case.
Recognising that these types of ad hominem arguments will dutifully degenerate to their anti-Christian, anti Judeo-Christian position … usually without citing a single scholarly fact … we are well advised to ignore most of the letter’s aimless meandering and focus on the continuing imperative to provide the Guyanese citizenry with the tools with which to make informed judgements.
Christians found out a long time ago that they could not abstract the concept of truth from the absolute truth that the person of Jesus represents. Though simple and straightforward in its articulation, to a non-Christian this fact may achieve absolutely no meaning initially.
However, placed alongside DeFreitas’s giddying indecision about characterising himself, the analogy becomes clear. He is at once torn between being a “descriptive ethical relativist”, a “normative ethical relativist”, a “humanist who believes in the scientific process”, and a “provisional moralist”.
The appropriate descriptive for DeFreitas therefore becomes (cited again ad nauseam): “If you don’t stand for something, you will fall for anything”.
Consistent with the idea of moral "relativism”, there simply is no core set of values informing DeFreitas’ arguments.
He is inventing arguments on the fly, and substantiates this by the grossly awkward statement, courtesy of Schemer: “In provisional ethics it would be reasonable for us to offer our conditional agreement that an action is moral or immoral if the evidence for and the justification of the action is overwhelming...Provisional moral principles are applicable for most people in most circumstances most of the time, yet flexible enough to account for the wide diversity of human behaviour, culture, and circumstances. . . These principles are not absolute (no exceptions), nor are they relative (anything goes). They are objective, in the sense that morality is independent of the individual."
While this sounds impressive, DeFreitas (and possibly Schemer) is blissfully ignorant that the last statement in this quotation has confirmed the very argument that he seeks to destroy … that “objectivity” (or its absence) can and will only be determined by reference to a “yardstick” however defined.
However difficult that yardstick is to conceptualise or define, it is always possible to right-thinking and reasonable men everywhere.
No less an institution than the District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals approved the discharge of a homosexual from the military, finding homosexuality 𠇊 form of behaviour never before protected and indeed traditionally condemned.” The court held that its decision would be based on constitutional principle, not on shifting public opinion [Dronenberg v. Zech 741 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir., 1984)].
In this regard scholarship and research, far from being DeFreitas’ nemesis, can well provide the truth that he so desperately seeks to avoid. He again makes an elementary blunder as he becomes emotional on the “rights” issue: “My debate is on basic and inherent human rights, not special privileges”.
He is now describing and articulating a fantasy, a ghost that has no substance - in that he is hoping that our memories are short. The fact is that the courts in other territories have already decided on the matter.
The U.S. Supreme Court settled the question in Bowers v. Hardwick (478 US 186, 1986). Mr. Hardwick had brought suit in the federal district court, challenging the constitutionality of the Georgia statute that criminalised consensual sodomy. He lost at the district court level, but won on appeal to the Court Of Appeals, which held that the Georgia statute violated his fundamental rights.
The Supreme Court disagreed. In a vigorously written opinion, Justice White pointed out that any fundamental liberties protected by a right to privacy must be “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”, or deeply rooted “in the nation’s history and tradition”.
Because sodomy was traditionally a criminal offence in all states, to find that a right to engage in anal or oral sodomy was deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition or is “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” would be “at best facetious”. Summing up, the Court said: “And if Respondent’s submission is limited to the voluntary sexual conduct between consenting adults, it would be difficult to, except by fiat, to limit the claimed right to homosexual conduct while leaving exposed to prosecution adultery, incest and other sexual crimes, even though they are committed in the home. We are unwilling to start down that road.”
In a concurring opinion, Justice Burger pointed out the moral dimension: “To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.” The obvious question: is “millennia of moral teaching” enough of a yardstick for a “provisional moralist”?
We conclude again with the article at http://www.ifca.org/sites/gay_marriage.htm. “Other relationships have not been accorded the same status as marriage because they do not contribute in the same way to a community. To put it bluntly, societies can get along quite well -- in fact, better -- without same-sex sexual relationships, but no society can survive without marriages and families.
In fact, because the term "heterosexual marriage" is redundant, the term "marriage" will mean in this essay what it has always meant: the social, legal and spiritual union of a man and a woman. "Gay marriage" is an oxymoron, an ideological invention designed to appropriate the moral capital of marriage and family toward the goal of government-enforced acceptance of homosexuality. As such, the term "gay marriage" is a counterfeit and a fraud.
It would undermine support for marriage by ending marriage's unique legal and cultural status. It would also undermine support for natural families, whose foundation is marriage”.
ROGER WILLIAMS
Chord of humanity touched
THE tsunami disaster is now estimated at more than 155,000 dead with thousands upon thousands more lives unaccounted for.
But in as much as the magnitude and horror of this tragedy defies imagination, there has been a "tidal wave" of human compassion from peoples and governments throughout the world - irrespective of race, religion, culture, ideology.
Here is a list of help and pledged contributions so far in US dollars:
Australia : $764 million over five years. Also sent five air force transport planes with supplies and medical specialists to Sumatra, and two 15 member emergency medical teams and 12 police to Phuket.
Austria: $1.4 million
Belgium: Military plane to transport aid supplies
Britain: $96 million
Canada: $67 million
China: $63 million
Czech: $446,000 plus drinking water and medicine
Denmark: $76 million
Egypt: Egyptian Red Crescent Society sending medicine worth $81,000 as initial step
European Union: $132 million
Finland: $ 6.2 million
France: $67 million
Germany: $ 680 million over three to five years
Greece: $1.34 million
Ireland: $13 million
Israel: one medical team to Sri Lanka, one to Thailand
Italy: $95 million
Japan: $500 million, sent three navy vessels to Thailand to rescue survivors
Kuwait: sent $1,000,000 immediate aid and pledged $2 million supplies.
Netherlands: $32 million
Norway: $183 million
North Korea: $150,000.
Poland: $336,000 for Polish NGOs involved in relief
Qatar: $25 million
Saudi Arabia: $30 million
Singapore: $1.2 million, military medical teams and supplies ready to fly to Indonesia
Slovakia: $231,660 worth of drinking water, tents and medical supplies to Sri Lanka
Slovenia: $113,500 of aid through Red Cross and Crescent
South Korea: $50 million
Spain: $68 million, also sent to Sri Lanka first aid, sanitary equipment and 19 volunteers
Sweden: $75.5 million
Switzerland: $23 million
Taiwan: $$50.52 million
United Arab Emirates: $20 million
United States of America: $350 million plus over $355 million from individuals and private organisations. Also sent 12 vessels and helicopters for relief and rescue operations
International Committee of Red Cross: 105 tons of supplies, aid to 150,000 people in north and east, trying to raise $44 million,
IMF: unspecified pledge
UN World Food Programme: sending 168 tons of commodities to Sri Lanka, plus more than
4,000 tons of rice, wheat flour, lentils, and sugar.
UN Development Programme: $100,000 each to Sri Lanka, Indonesia, the Maldives, and Thailand to help assess damage and coordinate emergency needs. (report from MSNBC.com)
Of course there is the commendable $50,000 from the Government of Guyana plus the contributions from the business sector.
But how about Russia and Cuba?
This MSNBC list is by no means exhaustive - there is so much more to come from governments, individuals and organisations. This unprecedented response from the world has certainly touched a chord of humanity and Godliness.
Perhaps there is hope yet for mankind.
SHAWN MANGRU
Bawling preachers
PREACHING violence against children by hysterically bawling on the early morning airwaves, “Spank them, spank them, spank them,” is not preaching the Gospel of Gentle Jesus, who once said, “Whoso shall offend [abuse] one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Matthew 18:6).
For my reward, I want a crown, not a millstone. It is a crime to advocate violence against any person or any group, from babies to adults.
These same preachers say nothing about child sexual abuse, of which six cases were reported in the print media during the season of peace and goodwill to all men (but apparently not to children).
The instruction to beat children was given by King Solomon who beat his own son Rehoboam who turned out to be the first wholly evil king of Israel.
Behold, a greater than Solomon is here.
M. XIU QUAN-BALGOBIND-HACKETT
Two sides of Guyana
FIRST, I extend best wishes for an uplifting 2005 to all of my countrymen.
Next, I share with you the two sides of a wonderful place in the sun that always leave me baffled, and not a little less empty.
One side is beautiful, and the other is disheartening.
At 3 o’clock in the morning, where can one swing gently in a hammock, and hear the rustle of the leaves, see the stars actually twinkle, or feel the spray of a rain shower?
It is 6 a.m. and instead of the roar of a subway train, there are the sounds of insects, and birds, and domestic animals.
Where is it that the relentless heat can reduce one away from the grasp of Weight Watchers programmes? Even the deplorable situation where the entire city becomes inundated after a mere four hours of rainfall can be fascinating.
There is the endless hospitality, the natural foods, the fresh, sweet air. This is the enchanting and beautiful side, and it is worth every minute of time saved and every dollar spent.
Then, there is the other side that we must touch and from which we must resist the instinct to recoil. The first example is the Christmas party held in the compound of the Georgetown Hospital. Yes, in the compound of the Georgetown Hospital beginning at 9 p.m. and which concluded at 1 a.m. The music easily reached Main Street and New Garden Street. And while I listened in astonishment, it was only later that I wondered about the hapless and captive patients writhing in their beds.
Everywhere there were people barging to the front of waiting lines. This happened in the marketplace, in the shops, and at the airport. This occurred at Timehri and at JFK; both going and coming.
There is no decorum, no courtesy, just the swagger of the empty headed, and swell bellied. These are some of the same folks who turn up at the Immigration counter without paying the departure tax; without an Immigration Form; and with an Immigration Form that occupies an Immigration Officer the better of 10 minutes, instead of 45 seconds.
The culprits are of all colours, ages, and sport accents that require the services of a UN interpreter to decipher what they are saying, because it certainly does not sound anything like the English language.
There was the despair of being approached in the vicinity of the Lotus Lounge at Timehri by children whose ages must be in the single digits. Their hands were outstretched in a silent plea, and 15 minutes later you watch them blow your generosity away in an explosion of squibs.
In another instance, there was a young girl of maybe six years of age who came with palm upturned and outstretched, and when offered some biscuits shook her head in rejection; only legal tender accepted.
This is the dark side of Guyana, the one that we do not want to see but infiltrates our consciousness in an increasingly prolific manner.
None of this is about poverty; it is about an all too prevalent mindset that is bordered by a shallow arrogance on the one hand, and a deep seated calculation on the other. This is the disheartening side, the one that will not go away, but seems to grow in strength every year.
It is a struggle, but I try to take the good with the not so positive. There is still much to love, to admire, and to absorb and I was blessed with an abundance of the same.
For this, there can only be heartfelt appreciation.
GHK LALL
Guarantee their safety
IT’S a shame when we have committed Peace Corps volunteers in our community, who are dedicated to the uplifting of people’s lives and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
It’s a shame when we have Peace Corps volunteers teaching in our school whose main concern are making sure that your child could read and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
It’s a shame when we have Peace Corps volunteers who give all their time and energy to make sure your child knows the truth and myths of HIV and AIDS and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
It’s a shame when we have Peace Corps volunteers who use their own money and other resources to make someone’s life a little easier, and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
It’s a shame when we have Peace Corps volunteers teaching our children Information Technology in our schools and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
It’s a shame when we have Peace Corps volunteers teaching our business community Information Technology and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
It’s a shame that we have Peace Corps volunteers who assist in pre and post natal care with our mothers in the community and we do nothing to guarantee their safety.
Several Peace Corps volunteers in New Amsterdam were constantly harassed, threatened and physically assaulted several times by one individual. Despite repeated efforts by the U.S. Peace Corps to resolve this situation with this particular individual, nothing was done.
Because of this issue, the Peace Corps volunteers in the area were withdrawn. There will be no more Peace Corps volunteers in the area for the foreseeable future.
Guyana is always looking outside for things. We depend on the World Bank and other lending institutions for money. Then we beg for debt forgiveness.
We depend on barrels from outside family members. Then we sit around and don’t look for jobs. We depend on volunteers. Then we rob, harass, beat up and rape them and the people in authority are reluctant to address these life-threatening issues.
It seems so simple. Why is it so complex? One individual has hampered the efforts of people who willingly come from the outside and have so much to contribute to our development as a nation and people.
While the people who are responsible to protect, enforce and assist us nonchalantly go about their business, the country continues to stand still and our children keep on suffering.
People in charge of our welfare and safety need to be decisive. Act instead of talk. Be proactive instead of reactive.
Take responsibility.
SYDNEY TAIT
The future grows brighter
GUYANA, as a bright new tourism attraction, will, as it continues to be developed, further improve its economic development and prosperity.
We have seen over the years, the very active promotion of our country as a unique tourism destination and it has been catching on leading to more tourists coming here.
This has meant the opening of many new resorts and businesses with the consequent provision of additional jobs.
Guyana’s future grows brighter.
MELISSA WATSON
|